Celebrities and public figures have long had species named after them, from Lady Gaga’s fern genus to Barack Obama’s bee. While some argue that naming species after celebrities can raise awareness and contribute to conservation efforts, others are concerned about the potential negative impact on the survival of these species. The debate over whether to continue naming new species after public figures will be a central focus of discussion at the International Botanical Congress in Madrid.
Some scientists are calling for stricter guidelines on naming species after celebrities, particularly those who are unrelated to the field. There is also concern about offensive or controversial names given to species, as well as the potential for collectors to exploit celebrity-linked species, as seen with the Adolf Hitler beetle.
While celebrity names can attract attention to overlooked species and conservation efforts, there are also concerns about the distraction this debate may cause from the urgent task of identifying the millions of species still unknown to science. Researchers are emphasizing the importance of thoughtful consideration when naming new species, as well as the responsibility that comes with the naming process.
Overall, the naming of species after public figures remains a complex issue that requires careful consideration of the potential implications on species conservation and public perception. The discussions at the International Botanical Congress will play a key role in shaping future guidelines for naming species and addressing the challenges associated with celebrity namesakes in the natural world.
Source
Photo credit amp.theguardian.com