Finland recently introduced a new law to address cases of instrumentalized migration, causing alarm due to its sweeping provisions. The law, passed in response to a crisis where migrants were enticed by Russian authorities to cross the border, allows border guards to prevent asylum seekers from entering Finnish territory based on suspicions of foreign interference. Critics argue that the law violates international norms such as the principle of non-refoulement and collective expulsions. The Finnish government defends the law as a necessary response to potential threats from Russia and stresses that it is aimed at preventing people from being used in hybrid actions.
The law has faced intense scrutiny for potentially setting dangerous precedents and imposing unrealistic responsibilities on border guards. Concerns have been raised about the lack of appeal options for asylum seekers and the potential mass deportations that could result from the law. Legal experts and human rights organizations have criticized the law as a breach of international and European standards for refugee protection.
Despite the controversy surrounding the law, the European Commission has remained silent on the issue, prompting questions about its commitment to ensuring EU norms are upheld. Critics argue that political considerations within the EU may be influencing the response to Finland’s new legislation. The law’s passage has sparked debates about the balance between national security and human rights obligations, with many calling for a reconsideration of its provisions.
Source
Photo credit www.euronews.com