The former commander of Minnesota Governor Tim Walz’s National Guard unit has raised concerns about the accuracy of Walz’s claims about his military status. The former commander, retired Major General Irv Baxter, has stated that he never knew Walz to hold the rank of sergeant major, as Walz has previously claimed. Baxter also noted that Walz did not serve in combat during his time in the National Guard, despite Walz’s assertions that he did.
Baxter’s comments have sparked a debate about the accuracy of Walz’s military record and the potential implications for his political career. While Walz has been open about his service in the National Guard and has spoken about the impact it had on him, the discrepancies in his claims about his rank and combat experience have raised questions about his credibility.
Walz has responded to Baxter’s remarks by stating that he has always been truthful about his military service and that he has never claimed to have been in combat. He also noted that his military records have been publicly available for years and have not been disputed.
The controversy is likely to continue as both supporters and critics of Walz weigh in on the issue. Some believe that the discrepancies in his military record are concerning and could impact his reputation, while others argue that his service in the National Guard should be judged on its own merits, regardless of any inconsistencies in his statements.
Overall, the challenges to Walz’s military status claim have raised questions about his credibility and honesty, and may have implications for his political future.
Photo credit
news.google.com
