In 1997, when Britain returned Hong Kong to Chinese rule, Beijing promised to maintain civil liberties in the city. However, a new measure called the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance, also known as Article 23 law, was recently enacted in Hong Kong. Critics argue that this law will further suppress free expression in a city known for its openness.
Article 23 complements a national security law imposed by Beijing in 2020, leading to a significant erosion of civil liberties. Critics claim that this law empowers the government to create crimes at its discretion, potentially impacting free expression more than the previous law.
Proponents of the law, including top Hong Kong officials, argue that it will enhance safety and stability in response to the 2019 protests. The legislation focuses on crimes such as treason and espionage, with assurances that it will only target those with malicious intent.
The rushed adoption and vague provisions of Article 23 have been criticized by the United Nations and U.S. Secretary of State. Concerns have been raised about the impact of this law on international businesses, economic freedom, and the future of Hong Kong as a global financial center.
While some business groups support the law for its potential to create a safer environment, others fear its impact on freedom of expression and business operations. The passage of Article 23 has left many residents ambivalent, as the city’s historical dynamic energy and free market principles are now in question. Critics warn that the law could fundamentally alter the nature of Hong Kong and its role in the global economy.
Photo credit
www.nbcnews.com
